Mocking religion should be punishable by death? I see tolerance is a one way street.Originally Posted by Seqo
1) Santa Claus was popularised, not invented, by Coca Cola.i would find what they believe in a little weird - ie Santa Claus. however, Santa and the world being flat are easily proven as False. Santa being created by the Coca Cola company and the fact that people have been outside of the atmosphere to see that the world is not, indeed, flat.
2) There are arguements to support the Flat Earth theory, which also explain the evidence refuting it.
Do you have any reasons why it's different, aside from 'I say so'?it is a very different story in proving a religion entire belief system is wrong.
I'd like for you to disprove the Toothfairy. Prove it doesn't exist.technically you are jeering at something which you are unable to disprove, yet you jeer at it anyway.
The burden of proof lies with those making absurd claims. You cannot logically disprove a negative hypothesis.
If I were to claim I were Mohandas Gandhi, I would need to provide the evidence to you, especially considering Gandhi died over fifty years ago. Until I provide the necessary evidence that Gandhi could have returned from the dead and start posting on an Internet gaming forum, it's assumed I am not Gandhi.
Likewise, when you believe in an invisible deity that allegedly Created Mankind from dust (whereas evolutionary theory disproves this), that this deity flooded the entire world (geologically impossible), or turned sticks to snakes and talks about fire breathing dragons, the burden of proof lies with you to prove it's existence.
The God as described in the Christian Bible does not exist. Period.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote